Advanced Search

EPP

地球与行星物理

ISSN  2096-3955

CN  10-1502/P

Citation: Qiao Wang, JianPing Huang, XueMin Zhang, XuHui Shen, ShiGeng Yuan, Li Zeng, JinBin Cao, 2018: China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite search coil magnetometer data and initial results, Earth and Planetary Physics. doi: 10.26464/epp2018044

doi: 10.26464/epp2018044

SPACE PHYSICS

China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite search coil magnetometer data and initial results

1. 

Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China

2. 

Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China

3. 

DFH Satellite Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China

4. 

School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Corresponding author: JianPing Huang, xhhjp@126.comJinBin Cao, jbcao@buaa.edu.cn

Received Date: 2018-09-02
Web Publishing Date: 2018-12-01

Four levels of the data from the search coil magnetometer (SCM) onboard the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) are defined and described. The data in different levels all contain three components of the waveform and spectrum of the induced magnetic field around the orbit in the frequency range of 10 Hz to 20 kHz; these are divided into an ultra-low-frequency band (ULF, 10–200 Hz), an extremely low frequency band (ELF, 200–2200 Hz), and a very low frequency band (VLF, 1.8–20 kHz). Examples of data products for Level-2, Level-3, and Level-4 are presented. The initial results obtained in the commission test phase demonstrated that the SCM was in a normal operational status and that the data are of high enough quality to reliably capture most space weather events related to low-frequency geomagnetic disturbances.

Key words: search coil magnetometer, CSES, data description, earthquake

Balasis, G., and Mandea, M. (2007). Can electromagnetic disturbances related to the recent great earthquakes be detected by satellite magnetometers?. Tectonophysics, 431(1–4), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.038

Cao, J. B., Zeng, L., Zhan, F., Wang, Z. G., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Meng Q. C., Ji, Z. Q., Wang, P. F., … Ma, L. Y. (2018). The electromagnetic wave experiment for CSES mission: Search coil magnetometer. Sci. China Technol. Sci., 61(5), 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9241-7

Davies, K., and Baker, D. M. (1965). Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964. J. Geophys. Res., 70(9), 2251–2253. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i009p02251

Fraser-Smith, A. C., Bernardi, A., McGill, P. R., Ladd, M. E., Helliwell, R. A., and Villard, Jr. O. G. (1990). Low-frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 17(9), 1465–1468. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i009p01465

Hayakawa, M., Itoh, T., Hattori, K., and Yumoto, K. (2000). ULF electromagnetic precursors for an earthquake at Biak, Indonesia on February 17, 1996. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(10), 1531–1534. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL005432

Huang, Q. H. (2011). Retrospective investigation of geophysical data possibly associated with the Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China. J. Asian Earth Sci., 41(4–5), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.014

Johnston , M. J. S., Mueller, R. J., and Sasai, Y. (1994). Magnetic field observations in the near-field the 28 June 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84(3), 792–798

Li, M., and Parrot, M. (2013). Statistical analysis of an ionospheric parameter as a base for earthquake prediction. J. Geophys. Res.:Space Phys., 118(6), 3731–3739. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50313

Maus, S., Rother, M., Holme, R., Lühr, H., Olsen, N., and Haak, V. (2002). First scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(14), 45-1–47-4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013685

Nagao, T., Enomoto, Y., Fujinawa, Y., Hata, M., Hayakawa, M., Huang, Q., Izutsu, J., Kushida, Y., Maeda, K., … Yoshino, T. (2002). Electromagnetic anomalies associated with 1995 Kobe earthquake. J. Geodyn., 33(4–5), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00004-2

Parrot, M. (2012). Statistical analysis of automatically detected ion density variations recorded by DEMETER and their relation to seismic activity. Ann. Geophys., 55(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5270

Parrot, M. (2006). Special issue of planetary and space science ‘DEMETER’. Planet. Space Sci., 54(5), 411–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.012

Parrot, M., Benoist, D., Berthelier, J. J., Błęcki, J., Chapuis, Y., Colin, F., Elie, F., Fergeau, P., Lagoutte, D., … Zamora, P. (2006). The magnetic field experiment IMSC and its data processing onboard DEMETER: Scientific objectives, description and first results. Planet. Space Sci., 54(5), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.015

Park, S. K., Johnston, M. J. S., Madden, T. R., Morgan, F. D., and Morrison, H. F. (1993). Electromagnetic precursors to earthquakes in the ULF band: A review of observations and mechanisms. Rev. Geophys., 31(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG00820

Shen, X. H., Zhang, X. M., Yuan, S. G., Wang, L. W., Cao, J. B., Huang, J. P., Zhu, X. H., Piergiorgio, P., and Dai, J. P. (2018). The state-of-the-art of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite mission. Sci. China Technol. Sci., 61(5), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9242-0

Shklyar, D. R., Nunn, D., Smith, A. J., and Sazhin, S. S., (1992). An investigation into the nonlinear frequency shift in magnetospherically propagated VLF pulses. J. Geophys. Res.:Space Phys., 97(A12), 19389–19402. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA01536

Tao, D., Liu, W. L., and Ma, Y. D. (2018). Plasma perturbations in the coexisting environment of VLF transmitter emission, lightning strokes and seismic activity. Sci. China Technol. Sci., 61(5), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9069-y

Wang, J. (2007). Historical earthquakes and a tsunami in Bohai Sea. Acta Seismol. Sin., 20(5), 584–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-007-0584-z

Yan, R., Parrot, M., and Pinçon, J. L. (2017). Statistical study on variations of the ionospheric ion density observed by DEMETER and related to seismic activities. J. Geophys. Res.:Space Phys., 122(12), 12421–12429. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024623

Zhang, X. M., Shen, X. H., Zhao, S. F., Yao, L., Ouyang, X. Y., and Qian, J. D. (2014). The characteristics of quasistatic electric field perturbations observed by DEMETER satellite before large earthquakes. J. Asian Earth Sci., 79, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.08.026

Zhao, Y. L., and Qian, F. Y. (1994). Geoelectric precursors to strong earthquakes in China. Tectonophysics, 233(1–2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90223-2

[1]

HaiLin Du, Xu Zhang, LiSheng Xu, WanPeng Feng, Lei Yi, Peng Li, 2018: Source complexity of the 2016 MW7.8 Kaikoura (New Zealand) earthquake revealed from teleseismic and InSAR data, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 310-326. doi: 10.26464/epp2018029

[2]

Xin Zhou, Gabriele Cambiotti, WenKe Sun, Roberto Sabadini, 2018: Co-seismic slip distribution of the 2011 Tohoku (MW 9.0) earthquake inverted from GPS and space-borne gravimetric data, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 120-138. doi: 10.26464/epp2018013

[3]

Rui Yan, YiBing Guan, XuHui Shen, JianPing Huang, XueMin Zhang, Chao Liu, DaPeng Liu, 2018: The Langmuir Probe Onboard CSES: data inversion analysis method and first results, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 1-10. doi: 10.26464/epp2018046

[4]

YiJian Zhou, ShiYong Zhou, JianCang Zhuang, 2018: A test on methods for MC estimation based on earthquake catalog, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 150-162. doi: 10.26464/epp2018015

[5]

XueMei Zhang, GuangBao Du, Jie Liu, ZhiGao Yang, LiYe Zou, XiYan Wu, 2018: An M6.9 earthquake at Mainling, Tibet on Nov.18, 2017, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 84-85. doi: 10.26464/epp2018009

[6]

LiSheng Xu, Xu Zhang, ChunLai Li, 2018: Which velocity model is more suitable for the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake?, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 163-169. doi: 10.26464/epp2018016

[7]

ZhiKun Ren, ZhuQi Zhang, PeiZhen Zhang, 2018: Different earthquake patterns for two neighboring fault segments within the Haiyuan Fault zone, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 67-73. doi: 10.26464/epp2018006

[8]

WeiMin Wang, JianKun He, JinLai Hao, ZhenXing Yao, 2018: Preliminary result for the rupture process of Nov.13, 2017, Mw7.3 earthquake at Iran-Iraq border, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 82-83. doi: 10.26464/epp2018008

[9]

Yi-Ching Lo, Li Zhao, XiWei Xu, Ji Chen, Shu-Huei Hung, 2018: The 13 November 2016 Kaikoura, New Zealand earthquake: rupture process and seismotectonic implications, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 139-149. doi: 10.26464/epp2018014

[10]

WeiMin Wang, JinLai Hao, ZhenXing Yao, 2018: Preliminary results for the rupture process of Jan. 10, 2018, Mw7.6 earthquake at east of Great Swan Island, Honduras, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 86-87. doi: 10.26464/epp2018010

[11]

XueMin Zhang, Vladimir Frolov, ShuFan Zhao, Chen Zhou, YaLu Wang, Alexander Ryabov, DuLin Zhai, 2018: The first joint experimental results between SURA and CSES, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 1-8. doi: 10.26464/epp2018051

[12]

YaLu Wang, XueMin Zhang, XuHui Shen, 2018: A study on the energetic electron precipitation observed by CSES, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 1-10. doi: 10.26464/epp2018052

[13]

XiaoZhong Tong, JianXin Liu, AiYong Li, 2018: Two-dimensional regularized inversion of AMT data based on rotation invariant of Central impedance tensor, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 430-437. doi: 10.26464/epp2018040

[14]

Xiao Xiao, Jiang Wang, Jun Huang, Binlong Ye, 2018: A new approach to study terrestrial yardang geomorphology based on high-resolution data acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): A showcase of whaleback yardangs in Qaidam Basin, NW China, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 398-405. doi: 10.26464/epp2018037

Article Metrics
  • PDF Downloads()
  • Abstract views()
  • HTML views()
  • Cited by(0)
Catalog

Figures And Tables

China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite search coil magnetometer data and initial results

Qiao Wang, JianPing Huang, XueMin Zhang, XuHui Shen, ShiGeng Yuan, Li Zeng, JinBin Cao