Advanced Search

EPP

地球与行星物理

ISSN  2096-3955

CN  10-1502/P

Citation: WenShuang Wang, XiaoDong Song, 2019: Analyses of anomalous amplitudes of antipodal PKIIKP waves, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 212-217. doi: 10.26464/epp2019023

2019, 3(3): 212-217. doi: 10.26464/epp2019023

SOLID EARTH: SEISMOLOGY

Analyses of anomalous amplitudes of antipodal PKIIKP waves

1. 

School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

2. 

Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 61820, USA

Corresponding author: XiaoDong Song, xiao.d.song@gmail.com

Received Date: 2019-01-28
Web Publishing Date: 2019-05-01

Approaching the distance of 180°, seismic focusing greatly amplifies the normally weak PKIIKP phase (underside reflection from the inner core boundary). Anomalously strong amplitudes of the PKIIKP phase reported previously at near antipodal distances (at seismic station TAM in North Africa) have been interpreted to infer anomalous structure(s) of the inner core boundary (including a sharp drop of compressional wave speed in the bottommost outer core or a near-zero shear wave speed in the topmost inner core). However, our observations of 12 earthquakes located antipodal to TAM (including the previously cited four events) suggest, for several reasons, that the anomalous PKIIKP energy might be a seismic phase misidentification. The anomalous phase appeared at distances less than 179.6° but not at larger distances (~179.8°). The phase appears consistently from antipode to distances less than 160° and has horizontal slowness similar to the PKIKP phase (going straight through the inner core). Its travel times vary greatly and show a systematic difference between two groups of events at different distances. A simple point scatter provides a good match to the travel times and the systematic variation of the anomalous phase at most stations, suggesting that it could originate from scattering off strong heterogeneities in the mantle wedge above the subducting Tonga slab. The phase misidentification suggests that the previously proposed inner core boundary structure(s) based on the anomalous phase need to be re-evaluated.

Key words: PKIIKP; PKIKP; antipodal; inner core; amplitude; scattering

Adam, M. C., Ibourichène, A., and Romanowicz, B. (2018). Observation of core sensitive phases: constraints on the velocity and attenuation profile in the vicinity of the inner-core boundary. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 275, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2017.12.008

Attanayake, J., Thomas, C., Cormier, V. F., Miller, M. S., and Koper, K. D. (2018). Irregular transition layer beneath the Earth’s inner core boundary from observations of antipodal PKIKP and PKIIKP waves. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 19(10), 3607–3622. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007562

Butler, R., and Tsuboi, S. (2010). Antipodal seismic observations of temporal and global variation at Earth's inner-outer core boundary. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37(L11), L11301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042908

Cormier, V. F., Attanayake, J., and He, K. (2011). Inner core freezing and melting: Constraints from seismic body waves. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 188(3-4), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2011.07.007

Cormier, V. F. (2015). Detection of inner core solidification from observations of antipodal PKIIKP. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(18), 7459–7466. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065367

Dziewonski, A. M., and Anderson, D. L. (1981). Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25(4), 297–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7

Niu, F. L., and Chen, Q. F. (2008). Seismic evidence for distinct anisotropy in the innermost inner core. Nat. Geosci., 1(10), 692–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo314

Pardo, C., Bonaime, S., Stutzmann, E., Maggi, A., and Group, G. (2009). New developments of the geoscope program. In American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009. Washington: AGU.222

Song, X. D. (1997). Anisotropy of the Earth’s inner core. Rev. Geophys., 35(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG01285

Souriau, A. (2015). Presumption of large-scale heterogeneity at the top of the outer core basal layer. Earth. Planet Sci. Lett., 415, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpgl.2015.01.024

Takeuchi, N., Geller, R. J., and Cummins, P. R. (1996). Highly accurate P-SV complete synthetic seismograms using modified DSM operators. Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(10), 1175–1178. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00973

Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., and Wobbe, F. (2013). Generic Mapping Tools: Improved version released. Eos, 94(45), 409–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001

Zheng, Y. C., Lay, T., Flanagan, M. P., and Williams, Q. (2007). Pervasive seismic wave reflectivity and metasomatism of the Tonga mantle wedge. Science, 316(5826), 855–859. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138074

[1]

Jiang Yu, Jing Wang, Jun Cui, 2019: Ring current proton scattering by low-frequency magnetosonic waves, Earth and Planetary Physics. doi: 10.26464/epp2019037

[2]

BinBin Ni, Jing Huang, YaSong Ge, Jun Cui, Yong Wei, XuDong Gu, Song Fu, Zheng Xiang, ZhengYu Zhao, 2018: Radiation belt electron scattering by whistler-mode chorus in the Jovian magnetosphere: Importance of ambient and wave parameters, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 1-14. doi: 10.26464/epp2018001

[3]

Hao Chen, JinHu Wang, Ming Wei, HongBin Chen, 2018: Accuracy of radar-based precipitation measurement: An analysis of the influence of multiple scattering and non-spherical particle shape, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 40-51. doi: 10.26464/epp2018004

Article Metrics
  • PDF Downloads()
  • Abstract views()
  • HTML views()
  • Cited by(0)
Catalog

Figures And Tables

Analyses of anomalous amplitudes of antipodal PKIIKP waves

WenShuang Wang, XiaoDong Song